The New York Times has a nice review of the 2007 Wrangler:
The Wrangler continues its classic body-on-frame truck construction, but Jeep says the structure is much stronger, helping to improve the ride and handling on pavement.
Nevertheless, on anything but a smooth surface the two-door’s ride is choppy and rough. The Unlimited rides more comfortably because of its much longer wheelbase, although its occupants still take some licks.
Unlike most modern passenger cars, the Wrangler does not have an independent suspension. Instead, Jeep kept solid axles in the front and rear, a robust design favored by off-roaders. But those solid axles mean that when one side hits a bump, the unpleasantness is shared all round.
The on-pavement handling is competent — in other words, a lot better than it used to be — and the Wranglers are reasonably friendly to drive with a few sacrifices. But it is clear that pounding the pavement is not their primary purpose.
Understanding that primary purpose is the key to happiness. Unlike many vehicles that handle a wide variety of tasks with overall competence, the Wrangler remains a specialist aimed at backwoods trails. Its on-pavement performance, while improved, could easily become aggravating without a consolation prize — like finding yourself in places where no cars have gone before.
Check out the entire review.
Reader Reactions
The comments are owned by the poster.
We aren't responsible for their content.
You must login or register to post a comment.
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
jerryjeep | Posted: 2007/1/23 23:40 Updated: 2007/1/23 23:40 |
Not too shy to talk ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/8/28 From: Southeast, Michigan Posts: 32 |
![]() Totally inept as a writer and lacking adequate understanding of the subject has resulted in Mr. Jensen's review of the 2007 Wrangler being a waste of ink! If "ignorance is bliss" this idiot must be the happiest man on Earth. A better test of the Wranglers prowess would be to tie this guy's ankles to a tow strap attached to the rear tow hook, then measure the impact on the Wrangler's quarter mile times.
![]() |
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
GoNsnow | Posted: 2007/1/23 6:20 Updated: 2007/1/23 6:20 |
Not too shy to talk ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/12/15 From: NE Qe USA Posts: 27 |
![]() The New York Times, "all the news that's fit to print," my a$$. Having this waste of ink and tree pulp review a Wrangler is like having a rural Post Master write about crime in NYC subways or housing projects.
|
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
loner | Posted: 2007/1/22 11:42 Updated: 2007/1/22 11:43 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/23 From: Posts: 71 |
![]() FUFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFU!
If I hear that solid axle crutch of a comment one more time... Does anyone believe if you blindfolded this guy and took him for a ride in a Grand Cherokee and and something else he would be able to tell the differnce? These people are the reason American cars and trucks are tuned to ride like wet cardboard and then bitch that they don't handle as well as other brands. Idiots. |
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
myhotwheels22981 | Posted: 2007/1/20 14:05 Updated: 2007/1/20 14:06 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2002/3/21 From: Posts: 183 |
![]() I would expect nothing less from a LIBERAL, PACAFIST, COMMUNIST, anti gun, anti border control, anti anti immmigration propoganda bullhorn.
P.S. Where's OOJ when you REALLY need him???? |
|
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
sylvanis | Posted: 2007/1/20 13:17 Updated: 2007/1/20 13:17 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/1/26 From: Posts: 104 |
![]() I think that the reviewer shows their complete and utter lack of understanding of the Wrangler with this statement: Unlike most modern passenger cars, the Wrangler does not have an independent suspension
When in the world was the Wrangler ever considered a PASSENGER CAR?!?!?!?! It's just plain ignorance. |
|
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
Josephus | Posted: 2007/1/20 12:01 Updated: 2007/1/22 13:20 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/7/18 From: Pennsylvania Posts: 243 |
![]() New York Times. The Big Apple. The City that never sleeps...
Not really the kind of challenges the Rubicon was designed to meet. He makes good note of the reasoning to purchase a Rubicon but doesn't look forward to getting stuck, grabbing the tow-rope and working it out? No mention of the locking axles, probably doesn't know what they are or why they are there. 4:1 transfer case just slows him down more. I think we have another car lover, evaluating an SUV. How about asking some Army grunts what they think, or better yet get R. Lee Ermy to evaluate it! Seriously though, if you don't know where your closest mud-hole is, and can't remember the last time you saw a two-track trail, than why bother getting into a Rubicon. Even if it is to test drive it and write it up. Update: Geez, I thought I was being harsh on the guy by calling him a "car-lover". You guys are like a bunch of pirahana. ![]() |
|