One of our readers (thanks, Jason!) passed along this link about how outside of the United States, Chrysler appears to be a leader in fuel-efficiency with its extensive lineup of diesel vehicles - the funny part is that they're all built here in the United States!
Chrysler is uniquely positioned among the Big Three US automakers. Unlike Ford and General Motors, Chrysler is already building a slew of high-MPG diesel-powered vehicles right here in the United States.
Amazing as it may seem in these difficult times, Chrysler is not allowed to sell those cars domestically, due to recently tightened emissions regulations. With the exception of the domestically-available Jeep Grand Cherokee diesel, all of Chrysler’s North American manufactured high-MPG diesel-equipped vehicles are being shipped abroad.
Each and every one of Chrysler’s European models is available with a diesel engine, with the exception of the Dodge Viper. In fact, a diesel engine can be found under the hood of more than 50% of the vehicles that Chrysler sells in Europe.
All-in-all, a dozen Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep diesel-engined models are currently available outside of the United States, but are not sold domestically.
Here’s the eye-opener … half of those models currently achieve 35 miles per gallon combined.
That’s 35 MPG … right now.
The article is a great read - the fuel efficiency comparison numbers for the various Jeep models is very eye-opening.
Reader Reactions
The comments are owned by the poster.
We aren't responsible for their content.
You must login or register to post a comment.
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
66coronet | Posted: 2008/3/26 6:27 Updated: 2008/3/26 6:27 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/7/1 From: everett wa Posts: 17 |
![]() Did anyone else find the errors in the Digg article. The main one I saw is that the VM 2.8Lcrd is offered from the factory with 339lb-ft. I went to the Dodge uk, Chrysler UK and Jeep UK dealership web sights and at most the VM 2.8L crd puts out 174hp 302lb-ft for the nitro & wrangler sport 2dr & 4dr with manual. Wrangler limited used the 161hp 295lb-ft. The chrysler grand voyager just has a 161hp 265lb-ft 2.8Lcrd and offers the 3.8L in the uk. I thought 339lb-ft was a little much for a FWD minivan. 265lb-ft would at least give you additional tranny life.
The rest of the specs look right. Other than the few errors, I'm putting that link on my favorites. ![]() |
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
MarkH | Posted: 2008/3/25 4:41 Updated: 2008/3/25 8:02 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2005/7/20 From: The Great White North Posts: 406 |
![]() Great posts here!
Josephus, you hit the nail on the head!: By creating exceedingly stringent NOx emissions, the US govt. has all but eliminated the ability to utilize our best truly alternative fuel... The "Granola Bars" have screwed us up yet again! The new S15 ULSD diesels "scare" me because once all the pollution control equipment is out of warranty, the owners are stuck footing the bill to replace the NOx reduction gadgets & get our respective "$tate emissions" $tickers each year! Anyone out there want a refillable UREA cartridge leaking in their driveways? Add that to the INCREASED price (and, in some areas, limited availability) for the new S15 fuel and the PREMIUM price charged for new diesel engines, and their "advantages" quickly wane... Up here in the "Arctic" the biodiesel fuel can be a sticky problem, too... |
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
01TJ | Posted: 2008/3/24 16:04 Updated: 2008/3/24 16:04 |
Just can't stay away ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/8/25 From: Posts: 71 |
![]() Diesel produces more soot or smog than gasoline.
Diesel takes more crude oil to produce than gasoline. Read this... http://www.grinningplanet.com/2005/04- 12/diesel-vs-gasoline-article.htm |
|
Poster | Thread |
---|---|
myhotwheels22981 | Posted: 2008/3/24 13:46 Updated: 2008/3/24 13:46 |
Home away from home ![]() ![]() Joined: 2002/3/21 From: Posts: 183 |
![]() Yet another example of 'Yo Gubbamint" working for you. I guess they have to save the diesel supply for The Union Pacific R.R.(THE largest domestic user of Diesel fuel, even more than the U.S. Navy, which is second)
Now, I'm not a 'greenie' in any way, but there are 2 chemical procedures that are being moved from the laboratory into an industrial process that will positively affect the fuel we buy for our cars... The first is a process to convert garbage, and really any organic waste, into a useable diesel fuel... The second just appeared in Pop. Science this month, and it is a process of converting agricultural waste (corn stalks, sawgrass, etc) into a refinable material, using bacteria. These processes could provide 50-100% of our domestic fuel needs IFF they are applied on a large enough scale, but will that ever happen? we don't know. Certainly, 1 Hemp plant can provide more Ethanol than one entire corn stalk (corn and stalk), but the pot-heads would go nuts and ruin that too, and rightfully so, the government would probably not allow it to be grown, even for auto fuel. What it boils down to is that we have about 50 years of petrol fuel to go before something better comes along...I'm sure we have it, but, with China coming up as an emerging country, i'm sure the U.S.A. doesn't want to 'Grow' their fuel when our sworn economic enemy is still pumping it out of the ground. With Chiina barely able to feed their own population, I'd bet that the U.S. is betting on developing agri-fuel processes AFTER the wells go dry, so China and other un-friendly countries will be to-too busy fueling their domestic car fleet to wage war, military or economic. |
|
|